Efficacy Of New Insecticide Imidacloprid Fs 480 As Seed Dresser Against Thrips Incidence On Groundnut

0 Views

N.C. VENKATESWARLU* AND K. VEMANA

Department of Entomology, S.V. Agricultural College, Tirupati-517 502, Andhra Pradesh, India

ABSTRACT

Field experiment was conducted to evaluate “the efficacy of new insecticides as seed dresser against thrips incidence on groundnut” at farm, Agricultural Research Station, Kadiri, Andhra Pradesh during kharif 2010 in randomized block design with six treatments and four replications. Among 5 treatments, Imidacloprid 480 FS @ 1.0 ml kg-1 seed was found to be more effective in reduction of the thrips damage and also incidence of PSND/PBND followed by Imidacloprid 17.8 SL @2.0 ml kg-1, Thiamethoxam 25 WG @2.0 g kg-1 seed as seed dresser than untreated control. However, the highest pod yield (245.8 kg ha-1) was recorded in Imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 2.0 ml kg-1 followed by Imidaclopri 480 FS @ 1.0 ml kg-1 seed.

KEY WORDS:

Groundnut, Insecticides, Imidacloprid, Seed treatment, Sucking pests,

INTRODUCTION

Groundnut is one of the major oil seed crops, grown in a varied climatic condition in different states in India. The productivity of groundnut is quite low (1000 kg ha-1) compared to that of USA (3000 kg ha-1), China (2600 kg ha-1), Argentina (2100 kg ha-1) and Indonesia (1550 kg ha-1) (National Research Center for Groundnut, 2005). The major groundnut growing regions in Andhra Pradesh are Rayalaseema region with 14.74 lakh ha (82-83%) and major area is grown under rainfed cultivation (95%) followed by Telangana region with 2.06 lakh ha (10%) and Andhra region with 1.15 lakh ha (6%).The average yields are very low in groundnut. The reason for low productivity of groundnut is due to biotic and abiotic stresses during crop growth period. Pests and diseases are the major biotic stresses affecting yield. Also among biotic stresses, viral diseases Peanut stem necrosis disease (PSND) and peanut bud necrosis disease (PBND) are causing major concern to the groundnut production.

In India, Tobacco Streak Virus (TSV) was first identified during 2000 on sunflower (Prasada Rao et al., 2000). Subsequently, TSV caused an epidemic on groundnut in the year 2000 and the loss was estimated to the tune of Rs. 300 crore (Reddy et al ., 2002). Later the disease was named as peanut stem necrosis disease (PSND). The causal agent of peanut bud necrosis disease (PBND) in India was initially described as Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) (Ghanekar et al., 1979). Subsequently,based on serological, physiochemical and thrips transmission studies, the causal organism of bud necrosis disease in India was identified as Groundnut bud necrosis virus (Reddy et al., 1992). During 1993, GBNV caused 70-90 % loss of groundnut yield at Mainpuri, India (Singh, 1995) and based on severity of bud necrosis disease, few hot spot locations have been identified in India viz., Latur (Maharashtra), Rajendranagar (Andhra Pradesh), Palem (Andhra Pradesh) and Raichur (Karnataka) (Basu, 1995). At Agricultural Research Station, Kadiri, incidence of PBND ranged from 10.0-20.0 % in rabi season (Directorate of Groundnut Research reports, 2005 – 2011).

Tospoviruses are vectored by several species of thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) (Amin et al., 1981; Cho et al., 1988). The abundance of thrips in diverse cropping systems along with the broad host range of the Tospoviruses and lack of natural plant resistance to Tospoviruses have made their management extremely difficult (German et al., 1992). So far, 12 thrips species have been recorded as vectors of tospoviruses worldwide and Frankliniella schultzei, Scirtothrips dorsalis, Thrips tabaci and Thrips palmi are responsible for their spread and causing severe epidemics in Asia. Of these, Thrips palmi is the predominant vector species. It has been reported as the main vector of GBNV in India (Vijaya Lakshmi, 1994). Seed treatment with imidacloprid and thiamethoxam, protected cotton seedlings from thrips for at least 6 weeks from the onset of seed planting. Imidacloprid had a better efficiency against this sap

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the relative “efficacy of insecticides as seed dressers against thrips incidence on groundnut” at farm, Agricultural Research Station, Kadiri, Andhra Pradesh during kharif 2010 in randomized block design with six treatments of four replications. The groundnut variety K – 6 was used as test variety which is susceptible to the insect pests. The groundnut seed was treated with insecticides viz.,Imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 2.0 ml kg-1 seed, Acetamipride 20 SP @ 2.0 g kg-1 seed, Fipronil 5 SC @ 4.0 ml kg-1 seed, Imidacloprid 480 FS @ 1.0 ml kg-1 seed (+ 5ml water), Thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 2.0 g kg-1 seed and untreated control 12.00 hours before sowing the seed and kept aside overnight. Imidacloprid 480 FS (Flowable Suspension) formulation is semi solid liquid. For uniform covering of 1 kg seed, 5.0 ml of water was added to 1.0 ml of Imidacloprid 480 FS formulation. The plot size was 5 x 4 m, plant to plant 10 cm distance and distance row to row 30 cm. Treated seed were dibbled in soil. All recommended package of practices were followed to raise good crop. Five plants were randomly selected from each plot for recording the observations. The incidence of thrips damage was recorded at 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 days after sowing and incidence of PSND was recorded at 45, 65 days and before harvest of the crop.The per cent incidence of thrips damage in each treatment was calculated by using the formula and the data were analyzed statistically. Data on per cent damage were subjected to angular transformation before statistical analysis. The yield of groundnut was recorded from each plot and converted into yield per hectare.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The early stage of groundnut crop is more vulnerable to viral infection of PSND / PBND through insect vector i.e thrips. Seed treatment with insecticides provide protection sucking pest than thiamethoxam (Jehan and Nour El-Hoda, 2013). Singh et al. (2014) reported that among the seed treatments, imidacloprid @ 3 g kg-1 was most effective and provided maximum reduction in population of sucking pests, which was significantly equal to thiomethoxam and acetamiprid on Okra. The efficacy of different insecticidal seed treatments were tested against aphid, Aphis craccivora Koch, leafhopper, Empoasca kerri Pruthi, defoliator, Spodoptera litura (Fab.) and pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.) on black gram (GailceLeo Justin et al., 2015).to crop upto 30 day from sucking insect damage and also protection from incidence of PSND in early stage. The data revealed that among five insecticidal seed treatments, Imidacloprid 480 FS @ 1.0 ml kg-1 seed was found to be more effective in reduction of thrips damage and also incidence of PSND/PBND (Table 1 and 2) followed by Imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 2.0 ml kg-1, Thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 2.0 g kg-1 seed as seed dresser against untreated control. The per cent damage of thrips was initially low (Table 1) as compared to untreated control later the incidence gradually increased. In general the incidence of PSND is more prevalent in the early stages of crop through insect vector than later stages. These results are corroborative with Singh et al. (2014) who reported that imidacloprid @ 3 g kg-1 was most effective and provided maximum reduction in population of sucking pests, seed germination %, numbers of fruit plant-1, plant height, fruit damage and fruit yield, which was significantly equal to thiomethoxam and acetamiprid. Iqbal et al. (2013), studied the combination of seed-treatment with imidacloprid spray with detergent and insecticides spray. Seed treatment and spray with detergent did not show distinctive effect on the pests’ population. While Imidacloprid and Thiomethoxam spray resulted maximum mortality of the jassid, followed by acetamiprid. Acephate resulted in the maximum control of thrips and was found the most effective insecticide followed by acetamiprid. Gailce Leo Justin et al. (2015), reported that the seed treatment with thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 3 g kg-1 of seed + spray with thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.4 g l-1 recorded the lowest population of aphids (1.60, 1.45 no. plant-1) and leafhoppers (2.36, 2.12 no. plant-1) followed by spraying of imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 0.4 ml l-1 with 83.96, 87.45 and 66.13, 71.61 per cent reduction over control. Harish Kumar Netam et al. (2013) evaluated the bio-efficacy of Imidacloprid 600 FS. When applied as seed treatment at the rate of 0.75 g a.i kg-1 seed, it was most effective against the sucking pests upto four week of seed germination with least 6.71 insect plant-1. It was followed by Imidacloprid 600 FS @ 0.60 g a.i. kg-1 seed and Thiamethoxam 70 WS @1 g a.i. kg-1 seed with 9.66 and 11.02 sucking pests plant-1. PSND incidences was low in early stage of the crop and later on gradually increased (Table 2) and again decrease at before harvest of the crop. Highest pod yield (245.8 kg ha-1) was recorded in Imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 2.0 ml kg-1 seed followed by Imidacloprid 480 FS @ 1.0 ml kg-1 seed table (Table 2).

Efficacy of Imidacloprid FS 480 against thrips in Groundnut

CONCLUSION

Among five insecticidal seed treatments, Imidacloprid 480 FS @ 1.0 ml kg-1 (+5 ml water) seed was found to be more effective in reduction of the thrips damage and also incidence of PSND/PBND followed by Imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 2.0 ml kg-1, Thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 2.0 g seed as seed dresser against untreated control. However, the highest pod yield (245.8 kg ha-1) was recorded in Imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 2.0 ml kg-1 followed by Imidaclopri 480 FS @ 1.0 ml kg-1 seed.

REFERENCES

  1. Amin, P W and Reddy, D V R and Ghanekar, A M. 1981. Transmission of tomato spotted wilt virus, the causal agent of bud necrosis of peanut, by Scirtothrips dorsalis and Frankliniella schultzei. Plant Disease. 65 (8): 663-665.
  2. Anonymous. 2004-2005. National Research Center for Groundnut, Junagadh, Gujarat. Annual Report. p 12-17.
  3. Anonymous. 2005 – 2011. Directorate of Groundnut Research reports, Junagadh, Gujarat. p 22-35.
  4. Basu M.S. 1995. Peanut bud necrosis disease: activities in the Indian national program. In: Recent Studies on peanut bud necrosis disease. Proceedings of a meeting of ICRISAT Asia center, India. p 61-63.
  5. Cho, J. J., R. F. L. Mau, R. T. Hamasaki and D. Gonsalves. 1988. Detection of Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus in Individual Thrips by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay. Phytopathology. 78(10): 1348-1352.
  6. Ghanekar. A. M, Reddy. D. V. R,Iizuka, N, Amin P. W and Gibbons R. W. 1979. Bud necrosis of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) in India caused by tomato spotted wilt virus. Annals of Applied Biology. 93(2): 173-179.
  7. GailceLeo Justin. C, Anandhiand. Pand. D. and Jawahar. 2015. Management of major insect pests of black gram under dry land condition. Journal of Entomology and Zoology. l.3 (1):15-121.
  8. Harish Kumar Netam, Rajeev Gupta and ShivamSoni. 2013. Bio-efficacy of insecticides as seed Treatment against early sucking pests of soybean crop. Journal of Plant Development Sciences. 5(1): 28-34.
  9. Iqbal, Jamshaid; Nadeem, Muhammad; Assi, Muhammad Saddique; Fiaz, Malik Muhammad; Ul Hassan and Muhammad Waqas. 2013. Comparative efficacy of
  10. some insecticides against sucking insect pests on Mungbean, Vignaradiata(l.) Wilczek. Gomal University Journal of Research. 29 (1): 31.
  11. Jehan B. El-Naggar, Nour El-Hoda and A. Zidan. 2013. Field evaluation of imidacloprid and Thiamethoxam against sucking insects and their side effects on soil fauna. Journal of Plant protection Research. 53 (4): 375-387.
  12. Prasada Rao. R.D.V.J., Reddy. A.S., Reddy. S.V., Thirumala Devi. K., Chnder Rao. S., Manoj Kumar.V.,Subramanyam.K., Yellamanda Reddy. T., Nigam.S.N and Reddy. D.V.R. 2000. The Host range of Tobacco streak virus in India and transmission by thrips. Annals of Applied Biology. 142(3): 365-368.
  13. Reddy.D.V.R, Ratna.A.S, Sudarshana.M.R, Poul.F and KiranKumar.I. 1992. Serological relationships and purification of bud necrosis virus, a tospovirus occurring in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in India. Annals of Applied Biology. 120(2): 279-282.
  14. Reddy, A.S., Prasad Rao, R.D.V.J., Thirumala Devi, K., Reddy,S.V., Maya, M.A., Roberts, I., Satyanarayana. T.,Subramaniam, K. and Reddy, D.V.R. 2002. Occurrence of Tobacco streak virus on peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in India. Plant Dis. 86: 173-78.
  15. Singh A.B. and S. K. Srivatava. 1995. Status and control strategy of peanut bud necrosis disease in Uttar Pradesh. In: Recent studies on peanut bud necrosis disease (A.A.M. Buiel, J.E. Parevliet and J.M.Lenne, ed.). Patancheru, India. ICRISAT Asia Centre, 65–68.
  16. Singh D.K., Pal Sundar, Umrao Ram Singh and Pal R.K. 2014. Efficacy of insecticides as seed treatment against sucking pests of Okra, (Abelmoschuse sculuntus). Annals of Plant Protection Sciences. 22(1): 88-91.
  17. Vijaya Lakshmi,K. 1995. Thrips palmi, general Pest and Vector of Some Tospoviruses in Asia. Recent Studies on Peanut Bud Necrosis Disease. Proceedings of a Meeting, ICRISAT Asia Center. p 11-14.
Join Us - Editorial Member Submit An Article Subscribe TO APJAS