Influence Of Sowing Date On Yield And Yield Components Of Bajra In Rainfed Alfisols Of Andhra Pradesh

0 Views

T. PRATHIMA*, P. SHOBA RANI, K.V. NAGA MADHURI AND P. LATHA

Department of Agronomy, Regional Agricultural Research Station, Tirupati – 517 502, Andhra Pradesh, India.

ABSTRACT

A field experiment was conducted in split plot design during kharif 2013 and 2014 on sandy loam soils in bajra to find out the suitable sowing time for hybrid bajra. The results revealed that second fortnight of June recorded significantly higher yield attributes viz. ear head length, girth, weight, 1000 grain weight and grain yield of bajra hybrid PHB-3 compared to rest of the dates of sowing. The heat use efficiency (HUE) and heliothermal use efficiency (HTUE) was the highest with June second fortnight sown crop.

KEYWORDS:

Bajra, Thermal Unit, HUE

INTRODUCTION

In India bajra is cultivated in an area of 8.9 million hectares with grain production of 6.51 million tones and productivity of 731 kg ha-1. In Andhra Pradesh, it is cultivated in an area of 0.05 million hectares with grain production of 0.05 million tones and productivity of 1178 kg ha-1. Bajra is a coarse grain crop and drought tolerant suitable to cultivate in drylands of Andhra Pradesh. Sowing during appropriate time enables any crop to take full advantage of favourable weather conditions. Sowing time for rainy season crops can be determined through information on onset and withdrawal of monsoon, probability of rainfall and rainfall distribution. However, determination of sowing time depends upon the soil moisture availability, optimum temperature, heat unit requirement and thermal use efficiency of crops. (Sahu et al., 2007)

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hybrids of bajra viz. PHB-3 and PHB-306 were sown on three different dates viz. 30th May, 15th June and 30th June 2013 at an interval of 15 days during kharif season of 2013 and 2014 in the dryland farm of Regional Agricultural Research Station, Tirupati in a split plot design with dates of sowing as main plot and bajra hybrids as sub plot treatments. Recommended agronomic practices were adopted for the region on red sandy loam soils was adopted for growing bajra crop. The soil of the experimental site was sandy loam with a pH of 6.8, E.C of 0.11, organic carbon of 0.18 available N of 129 kg ha-1 available P of 10.2 kg ha-1 and available K of 139.7 kg ha-1.Periodical observations on phenological development, yield and yield attribute characters (Table

1) were recorded. Growing degree days (GDD) were calculated using base temperature of 10°C from daily mean temperature. The thermal use efficiency for the seed yield of bajra was computed as heat use efficiency and heliothermal use efficiency.

Heat use Efficiency (HUE) = Seed yield (kg ha-1) / GDD °C day.

Heliothermal use Efficiency (HTUE) = Seed yield (kg ha-1) / HTU °C hr.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Yield and Yield attributes

The yield attributing characters like ear head girth (10.3 cm) and 1000 grain weight (9.98 g) were superior in June 2nd fortnight sowing where the crop received good distribution of rainfall with optimum temperature and maximum bright sunshine hours during 2013 (Table 1a). Among the hybrids, PHB-3 recorded the highest ear head length (23.97 cm), girth (10.2 cm) weight (41.72 g) and 1000 grain weight (9.08g) which are significantly superior than PHB-306. Similarly during 2014 (Table 1b) all the yield attributing characters like ear head length (23.11 cm), girth (10.11 cm), ear head weight (29.02 g) and 1000

grain weight (12.7 g) are superior in June 2nd fortnight sowing and PHB-3 recorded superior performance in yield and yield attributing characters. During both the years, the interaction effect was not significant among the dates of sowing and hybrids.

In the present study significantly higher grain yield (4326 and 6937 kg ha-1) of bajra was recorded when the sowing was done at 2nd fortnight of June (D3) followed by June 1st fortnight (D2) (3892 and 5572 kg ha-1) respectively during 2013 and 2014 (Table 1a and 1b). Significantly lower yield was observed with 1st date of sowing (D1) (3341 and 4833 kg ha-1) in both the years of study. The variation in grain yield of bajra during the both the years was due to difference in amount of rainfall received, but both the years showed similar trend (Deshmukh et al., 2009).

During both the years D1 (May 2nd fortnight) sown crop received less amount of rainfall with less rainy days during its growth period whereas June 1st and June 2nd fortnight sown crops received good amount of rainfall with well distribution and bright sunshine hours which might have contributed in getting good yields. The earliest sown crop experienced extreme moisture stress during the earhead emergence period which drastically reduced the partitioning of drymatter to earhead and its development could not be received even with sufficient moisture conditions later on. On the other hand, favourable moisture conditions during entire period enhanced the contribution to earhead considerably, as in case of June 2nd fortnight sowing (Annual reports of AICRP on Agrometeorology 2000-01). The heat use efficiency and heliothermal efficiency was highest in June 2nd fortnight sown crop compared to May 2nd fortnight and June 1st fortnight crop in both the years (Table 2a and 2b). The efficiency of thermal energy conversion for yield and dry matter production depend upon the genetic factors of crop and sowing time. The thermal use efficiencies were the highest for 3rd sowing (June 2nd fortnight) followed by 2nd and 1st sowings. The poorest thermal use efficiency was observed under the 1st sowing, which might have resulted low yields of bajra.

REFERENCES

  1. Annual reports of ACRIP on Agrometeorology, 2000.
  2. Deshmukh, L S, Jadhav A S, Raskar S K. 2009. Effect of sowing dates on grain and fodder yield of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) genotypes in summer season. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Science. 22(1): 186-187.
  3. Sahu D D, Chopada M C and Patoliya B M 2007. Determination of sowing time for chickpea varieties in south Saurashtra, India. Journal of Agrometeorology 9(1): 68-73.