Influence of Moisture Stress on Mung Bean Genotypes for Morphophysiological Traits

0 Views

Y. YOHAN. P. SUDHAKAR. V.UMAMAHESH, D. MOHAN REDDY AND V.SUMATHI
Department of Crop Physiology, S.V. Agricultural College, ANGRAU, Tirupati – 517502.

ABSTRACT

A field experiment was conducted with twelve Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) genotypes under water stress as well as irrigated conditions at S.V agricultural college, Tirupati. A wide variation was observed among the genotypes in their physio-morphological characters. The genotypes TBG-104, KU-12-13, KU-12-37, LBG-623 recorded significantly higher leaf area, dry matter partitioning under both irrigated as well as stress conditions, which denotes the ability of these genotypes in sustaining the photo synthesizing area and accumulation of photosynthates in stem. Whereas NDU-12-300 recorded lowest total dry matter during rabi 2015-16 and rabi 2016-17.

KEYWORDS:

Mung bean, moisture stress

INTRODUCTION

Drought stress is characterized by reduction of water content, diminished leaf water potential and turgor loss, closure of stomata and decrease in growth. Severe water stress may result in the arrest of photosynthesis, disturbance of metabolism and finally the death of plant. Water stress inhibits cell enlargement more than cell drought stress coupled with high temperature is associated with reduced water availability and cellular dehydration alters the cellular metabolism coupled with osmotic adjustment (Suruchi Khanna et al., 2016). However, production of blackgram is adversely affected by drought that reduce yield (Pandey et al., 2014). Soil moisture stress is a major hazard for successful crop production throughout the world. It reduces the productivity by delay or prevention of crop establishment, destruction of established crop, predisposition of crop to insects and diseases, alteration of physiological and biochemical metabolism in plant and quality of grain. However, species and genotypes vary in their capacity to tolerate water stress

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The experiment was laid out in a split plot design with two main treatments, twelve sub treatments and replicated thrice. Main Treatments: 2: i) Irrigated (control)

ii) Impose moisture stress at 60-80 DAS, Sub Treatments (12 Genotypes) KU -12-55, LBG-623, LBG-680, NDU-12-300, LBG-685, KU-12-14, LBG-645, KU-12-37, TBG-104, KU-12-33, LBG-752 and LBG-20. Following parameters are recorded every 15 days interval in both rabi 2015-16 and rabi 2016-17.

Plant height (cm)

Plant height was measured from the base of the plant to the tip of the leaf and expressed in cm.

Number of nodules

Nodules for three plants were counted at the every 15 days interval. The average of three plants was worked out.

Leaf area (cm2 plant-1)

After separation of leaves from the plant, leaf area was estimated using leaf area meter (LICOR model LI 3000) and expressed as cm2 plant-1.

Dry matter partitioning (g plant-1)

The dry weights of oven dried stems, leaves, roots and pods were recorded and expressed as g plant-1.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The plant height (cm) of twelve blackgram genotypes as influenced by irrigated and imposed moisture stress conditions during rabi 2015-16 and rabi 2016-17. Plant height had a continuous increase till crop reached maturity. The increase was exponential up to 45 DAS,

thereafter it has increased with decreasing trend during both the seasons. Significant differences were observed among moisture stress treatments and genotypes, throughout the crop growth except 15 and 30 DAS of rabi 2015-16. However, during rabi 2016-17 differences were significant through crop growth. Interactions effects were not significant in both seasons testing Similar significant differences between genotypes under irrigated as well as moisture stress conditions were also reported in chickpea (Sharma et al., 2007), and in greengram (Gosami et al., 2010)

Moisture stress condition during flower initiation stage to pod filling stage i.e 40 to 60 DAS decreased mean plant height significantly compared to irrigated condition in both the years. The extent of decrease was 13.3 and 14.1 percent at 45 DAS 16.0 and 19.1 percent at 60 DAS and 16.1 and 15.9 percent at 75 DAS in rabi 2015-16 and 2016-17 respectively compared to respective irrigated treatments (Table 1a&1b).

Among blackgram genotypes tested LBG-680 recorded highest plant height under irrigated (45.11 and 43.59 cm) as well as moisture stress (30.23 and 33.47) conditions in both the years plant height was after imposed moisture stress condition. In moisture stress condition plant height was not affected in TBG-104 in both the seasons followed by KU-12-13. NDU-12-300 recorded lowest plant height under irrigated (28.91 and 27.27) and moisture stress (24.54 and 23.45) conditions in both seasons. A similar result of decrease in plant height due to moisture stress was reported in greengram Baroowa et al., (2012), in chickpea (Razzak et al., 2014) and in blackgram (Nilanthi et al., 2014).

Increase the number of nodules up to 30 DAS and thereafter it was decreased relatively as the crop reached maturity during both the years of testing Significant differences were observed among treatments, genotypes and their interactions from 15 DAS to 75 DAS both the years. Similar results were reported in common bean (Ramos et al., 2003) and cowpea (Onuh and Donald, 2009)

Mean number of nodules significantly decreased after imposition of moisture stress from 45 to 60 DAS in moisture stress treatment compared to irrigated treatment in both years. The extent of decrease was 30.8 and 33.4 percent at 45 DAS, 52.8 and 46.7 percent at 60 DAS and

38.6 and 36.5 percent at 75 DAS in rabi 2015-16 and 2016-17 years compared to respective irrigated treatments (Table 2a&2b). Similarly, declines the nodule weight along with nodule number due water deficit in chickpea was reported by Jain et al., (2014).

Among the genotypes tested TBG-104 maintained significantly higher nodule number in irrigated control as well as moisture condition throughout crop growth followed by KU-12-13 and LBG-685 during both years of testing.

Soil dehydration results in a two-stage inhibition of nodule activity. The first stage clearly involves a rapid and simultaneous decrease in nitrogenase activity. The second stage of inhibition occurs under severe drought stress, when nodule activity is less than half of the initial rates finally decrease root nodule number reported by Serraj (2003).

Leaf area per plant is an important determinant in production and photosynthesis (Watson, 1947).The leaf area per plant showed a gradual increase up to 45 DAS and then declined in all the genotypes irrespective of the treatments both the years of testing due to occurrence of senescence. Significant differences were observed among moisture stress treatments, genotypes and interactions except 15 DAS during both the years. Similar significant differences were reported in chickpea (Zhang et al., 2004) and blackgram and greengram (Baroowa et al., 2012).

Due to imposition of moisture stress at flowering initiation stage i.e. from 40-60 DAS, mean leaf area decreased significantly and the extent of decrease was 18.9 and 19.9 per cent at 45 DAS, 29.8 and 33.6 per cent at 60 DAS in rabi 2016 and rabi 2017 years respectively compared to irrigated control treatments Leaf area decreased continuously with an increase in soil moisture stress as in mungbean (Ranawake et al., 2011) and blackgram and greengram (Pandiyan et al., 2017).

Among blackgram genotypes tested KU-12-37 recorded highest leaf area under irrigated (1306.73 and 1257.71 cm2) as well as moisture stress (820.84 and 798.56 cm2) conditions. However in TBG-104 leaf area was affected in moisture stress treatments (512.0 cm2) compared to irrigated treatment (537.93 cm2) at 75 DAS followed by KU-12-13 in both the rabi seasons LBG-645 recorded lower leaf area among all the genotypes tested during both seasons (Table 3a&3b)

Modification in leaf area is one of the basic causes which lead to reduction in average leaf size under water limiting situation of greengram and blackgram (Baroowa and Gogoi, 2016).

Root dry weight had a continuous increase up to 45 DAS, thereafter it has increased with decreasing trend during both the years of testing viz., rabi 2015-16 and rabi 2016-17. Root dry weight showed significant differences were observed among treatments, genotypes and interactions except 15 DAS in both the years. Similar results were reported in mungbean (Dhole and Reddy, 2010), chickpea (Parameshwarappa et al., 2012)

Mean root dry weight of stress treatment increased (1.04 g plant-1) numerically compared to control treatments (1.01 g plant-1).The increase observed in root weight under moisture stress indicate greater density of root and or greater depths of root penetration, both of these are important morphological adaptations to moisture deficit and results in greater extraction of soil water (Hoogcnboom et al., 1987). However, such effect was not sum as moisture stress progressed (60 DAS)

KU-12-13 maintained higher root dry matter irrigated (2.14 and 1.90) as well as moisture stress (1.93 and 1.74) conditions followed by LBG-623, KU-12-37 and TBG 104 whereas .NDU-12-300 showed lowest root dry matter (Table 4a&4b). Similar results were found in chickpea (Nisha Kataria and Narender Singh, 2014 and Pele et al., 2016).

The data on stem dry weight throughout growing season followed similar trend as that of root dry weight. Stem dry weight also showed significant differences among treatments, genotypes and their interactions

Shoot dry weight was affected under moisture stress condition compared to irrigated. Decrease in shoot dry matter under lower soil moisture might be due to reduction of leaf area and photosynthetic rate. The extent of decrease was 23.4 and 24.7 percent at 45 DAS, 58.9 and 58.2 per cent at 60 DAS and 26.9 and 34.2 percent at 75 DAS compared to respective irrigated treatments in rabi 2015-16 and 2016-17 years compared to respective irrigated treatments (Table 5a&5b). TBG-104 maintained higher stem dry weight during irrigated control moisture stress at 60 DAS and 75 DAS compared to all genotypes

followed by KU-12-13.in both the years, where as NDU-12-300 recorded lower stem dry weight under irrigated and moisture stress conditions

Decrease in shoot dry matter under lower soil moisture might be due to reduction of leaf area and photosynthetic rate. Retention of green leaves under drought conditions has been used as a selection criterion for drought resistance (Mostajeran and Rohimi-Eichi, 2009).

Similar to stem dry weight, leaf dry weight also showed significant differences among treatments, genotypes and their interactions. Similar results were reported in mungbean (Uddin et. al., 2013)

Mean leaf dry weight decreased significantly due to moisture stress from 45-60 DAS in moisture stress treatments compared to irrigated treatments. The extent of decrease was 0.69 and 3.53 percent at 45 DAS, 4.84 and 1.44 percent at 60 DAS compared to respective irrigated treatments. These results indicated that moisture stress at grand growth stage affected leaf growth and leaf dry weight. in mungbean (Tawfik, 2008).

Among the genotypes tested TBG-104 recorded highest leaf dry weight under irrigated (5.01 and 4.90 g plant-1) as well as moisture stress (4.96 and 4.80 g plant-

1) conditions during rabi 2015-16 and 2016-17 followed by KU-12-13 and KU-12-37 (Table 6a&6b). These results reveal that moisture stress affect leaf growth to prevent transpiration in blackgram crop also, however genotypic differences exists in sustaining leaf growth and its dry weight under low soil moisture conditions Superiority of TBG-104 and KU-12-13 in maintaining leaf area and leaf dry weight under moisture stress condition helped in sustaining photosynthesis and accumulation of photosynthates.

The decrease in dry weight of leaves among KU-12-55, NDU-12-300, LBG-645 genotypes occurs due to reduced rate of current photosynthesis and lower leaf turgor potential under stressed environment, which restricted the cell enlargement and division and hence reduction in expansion of leaf area, and it ultimately affected the active sink at the time of reproductive phaseas opined by Burman et al. (2002).

REFERENCES:

  1. Baroowa, B and Gogoi, N. 2012. Effect of induced drought on different Growth and Biochemical attributes of Black gram (Vigna mungo L.) and Green gram (Vigna radiata L.). Journal of Environmental Research and Development. 6(3A):584-593.
  2. Baroowa, B and Gogoi, N. 2016. Morpho-physiological and Yield responses of Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) and Greengram (Vigna radiata L.) genotypes under Drought at different Growth stages. Research Journal of Recent Sciences. 5(2): 43-50.
  3. Dhole, V. J. and Reddy, K. S. 2010. Gamma rays induced moisture stress tolerant long root mutant in mungbean (Vigna radiata L Wilczek). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 1(5):1299-1305.
  4. Gosami, R.K., Hiremath, S. M., Chetti, M .B., Koti, R.V and Salimath, P. M. 2010. Genotypic variation for physiological traits in relation to seed yield in green gram. Annals of Plant Physiology. 24 (1): 13-17.
  5. Hoogcnboom, G., Huck, M.G and Peterson, C.M.1987 Root growth rate of soybean as affected by drought stress. Journal of Agronomy. 79:607-614
  6. Jain, A.K., Ruhela, A.K and Panwar, J.D.S. 2014. Effect on nodulation and enzymatic activity related to nitrogen metabolism in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) under elevated temperature conditions. GERF Bulletin of Biosciences. 5 (1):1-9.
  7. Mostajeran, A and Rahimi-Eichi, V. 2009. Effects of Drought Stress on Growth and Yield of Rice (Oryza sativa L) Cultivars and Accumulation of Proline and Soluble Sugars in Sheath and Blades of their Different Ages Leaves. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences. 5: 264-272.
  8. Nilanthi, D., Ranawake, A.L and Senadhipathy, D.D. 2014. Effects of Water Stress on The Growth and Reproduction of Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.). Tropical Agricultural Research & Extension. 17(1):45-48.
  9. Nisha Kataria and Narender Singh. 2014. Assessing the effects of Applied potassium on selected Vigna radiata L. Genotypes under Water deficit. International Journal of Advanced Research, 2(10):369-385
  10. Onuh M. O and Donald, K. M. 2009. Effects of Water Stress on the Rooting, Nodulation Potentials and Growth of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp). Science World Journal. 4 (3):31-34.
  11. Pandey, S., Ror, S and Chakraborty, D. 2014. Analysis of biochemical responses in Vigna mungo varieties subjected to drought stress and possible amelioration. International Journal of Scientific Research in Agricultural Sciences. 1(1):6-15
  12. Pandiyan, M., Senthil, N., Balaji, T., Veeramani, P., Savitha, B. K., Sendhilvel, V and Gopilkrishnan, A. 2017. Studies on Performance of Drought tolerant Genotypes under Drought and normal conditions through Morpho,Physio and Biochemical attributes of Blackgram (Vigna mungoL.) and Greengram (Vigna radiata L.). International Journal of Advanced Research. 5(2): 489-496.
  13. Parameshwarappa, S.G., Salimath, P.M., Upadhyaya, H.D., Patil, S.S., Kajjidoni, S.T., Patil, B. C and Narayana, Y. D. 2012. Variation in root characters of selected drought tolerant accessions of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) grown under terminal drought. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural. Science. 25(3): 389-391.
  14. Pele, F.D., Yeboah, A., Buari, M.C and Kofi, E. J. 2016. Morpho-physiological parameters used in selecting drought tolerant cowpea varieties using drought index. African Journal of Agriculture. 3(1): 125-134.
  15. Ramos, M.L.G., Parsons, R., Sprent, J.I. and James, E.K. 2003. Effect of water stress on nitrogen fixation and nodule structure of common bean Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. 38(3): 339-347.
  16. Ranawake, A. L., Dahanayaka, N., Amarasingha, U. G. S, Rodrigo, W. D. R. J. and Rodrigo, U. T. D. 2011. Effect of water stress on growth and yield of mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) Tropical Agricultural Research & Extension 14(4): 2011.
  17. Razzak, M.A., Bahadur, M.M., Hafiz, M.H.R., Bala, P., Haque, A., Sadat, A and Azad, A.K. 2014. Irrigation levels influenced on Morph physiological characters of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L). International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research. 5(4): 65-75.
  18. Serraj, R. 2003.Effects of drought stress on legume symbiotic nitrogen fixation: Physiological mechanisms. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology. 41: 11361141.
  19. Sharma, K. D., Pannu, R. K., Tyagi, P. K., Chaudary, B. D and Singh, D. P. 2007. Water use efficiency and yield of chickpea genotypes as influenced by soil moisture availability. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology. 12(2): 168-172
  20. Suruchi M. Khanna, Pooja C. Taxak, Pradeep K. Jain and Saini. R. 2016. Specific activities and transcript levels of glycolytic enzymes under dehydration in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) seedlings. Legume Research: 39 (3): 405-410.
  21. Tawfik, K. M. 2008. Effect of water stress in addition to potassium application on Mungbean. Australia Journal of Basic Applied Science. 2(1): 42-52.
  22. Uddin, S., Parvin, S and Awal, M. A. 2013.MorphoPhysiological aspects of Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) in response to water stress. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research. 3(2): 137-148.
  23. Watson, D.J., 1947. Comparative physiological studies on the growth of field crops. Annals of Botany. 11: 4176.
  24. Zhang, M., Duan, L., Zhai, Z., Li, J., Tian, X., Wang, B., He, Z and Li, Z. 2004. Effects of plant growth regulators on water deficit-induced yield loss in soybean. Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress. Brisbane, Australia. 252-256.