GENETIC VARIABILITYAND CORRELATION STUDIES ON PHYSIOLOGICAL,YIELDAND YIELD ATTRIBUTES IN GROUNDNUT ( Arachis hypogaea L.).

0 Views

K. SARITHA*, R. P. VASANTHI, M. SHANTHI PRIYA AND P. LATHA

Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, S.V. Agricultural College, ANGRAU, Tirupathi- 517502, Chittoor Dt., Andhra Pradesh, India

ABSTRACT

The extent of genetic variability and association of important physiological, yield and yield characters were determined in a set of 32 groundnut genotypes. Analysis of variance revealed the existence of significant differences among genotypes for all the characters studied. The characters, pod yield plant-1, 100 seed weight and SLA at 60 DAS recorded moderate to high GCV, high heritability coupled with high genetic advance as percent of mean indicating that these traits were mainly under the influence of additive gene action and simple selection may be effective for improvement of these traits. Correlation and path co-efficient studies indicated that shelling percentage should be given major emphasis for the development of high yielding genotypes.

KEYWORDS:

Correlation, groundnut, heritability, Path co-efficients, SPAD Chlorophyll Meter

Reading (SCMR), Specific Leaf Area (SLA), Relative Water Content (RWC)

INTRODUCTION

The cultivated Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is a major crop in most tropical and subtropical regions of the world and in India it ranks first among edible oilseed group. It is of high value because of their high contents of oil (43-54%) and protein (25-30%). Genetic variability is the prerequisite for crop improvement as this provides wider scope for selection. Thus, effectiveness of selection is dependent upon the nature, extent and magnitude of genetic variability present in the material and the extent to which it is heritable. Hence, in present investigation an attempt was made to determine the performance of 32 groundnut genotypes to assess the variability of the important traits and to determine correlations between

these traits.

MATERIALSAND METHODS

The experimental material consisted of 32 genotypes of groundnut. The experiment was laid out in a randomised block design with two replications during rabi, 2017-18 at Regional Agricultural Research Station, Tirupati. Each genotype was sown in single row of 5 m length and 0.9 m width with a spacing of 22.5 cm between the rows and 10 cm between the plants within rows.

Recommended package of practices were followed in raising of the crop.

Data were recorded on SPAD Chlorophyll Meter Reading (SCMR) at 60 DAS, Specific Leaf Area at 60 DAS, Relative Water Content at 80 DAS, shelling percentage, 100-seed weight and pod yield plant-1 on five randomly chosen competitive plants in each genotype in each replication. The mean values of selected competitive plants were averaged and expressed as mean of the respective characters per replication. Data were subjected for Analysis of Variance (Panse and Sukhatme, 1961) and genetic parameters viz., Phenotypic Coefficient of Varia-tion (PCV), Genotypic Coefficient of Variation (GCV), heritability and genetic advance were estimated as per Lush ( 1940), Burton (1952), Allard (1960) and Johnson et al. (1955). Genotypic and phenotypic correlation co-efficients were calculated using the method given by Johnson et al. (1955). The direct and indirect effects of the yield components on the yield were estimated by path co-efficient analysis as suggested by Wright (1921) and elaborated by Dewey and Lu (1959).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Analysis of variance for all the characters studied revealed significant differences among the cultivars indicating variation in the material studied for most of the traits. Phenotypic coefficient of variation was found to be higher than genotypic coefficient of variation for all

the traits indicating the role of environment in the expression of characters.

GCV was found to be high for pod yield plant-1 ( 29.24%) and was moderate for 100-seed weight(16.66%) and SLA at 60 DAS (12.37%). GCV was low in case of SCMR at 60 DAS (5.47%), RWC at 80 DAS (5.55%) and shelling percentage (3.47%) (Table1).

Heritability was high for all the characters except for shelling percentage (52.40%) for which it was recorded and moderate. GAM was high for SLA at 60 DAS (25.40%), 100-Seed weight (34.11%) and Pod yield plant-1 (50.83%). GAM was moderate for RWC at 80 DAS (25.40%) and it was low for SCMR at 60 DAS

(9.06%) and shelling percentage (5.17%).

Bhavya et al. (2017) reported low to moderate PCV, GCV, high heritability and low to moderate GAM for SLA and SCMR, low PCV, GCV moderate heritabil-ity and GAM for shelling percentage and high PCV, GCV, heritability and GAM for pod yield plant-1. Srivalli and Nadaf (2016) observed low to moderate PCV, GCV, high heritability coupled with low genetic advance as percent of mean for SLA, SCMR and RWC traits. Balaraju and Kenchanagoudar (2016) observed low GCV, PCV, high heritability and low GAM for shelling percentage and moderate GCV, PCV, high heritability and high GAM for 100-Seed weight. Vasanthi et al. (2015) reported low GCV, heritability and GAM for shelling percentage and moderate GCV, high heritability and GAM for 100-seed weight

From the perusal of above findings, it is to be concluded that phenotypic selection would be more effective for improvement of SLA at 60 DAS, 100-seed weight and pod yield plant-1 in early generations.

Correlation and path analysis: Through correlation and path analysis, the nature and extent of association between different characters influencing yield and causes of association can be better understood which helps in formulation of selection criteria for improvement of yield. In general, the genotypic correlation co-efficients were higher than the corresponding phenotypic correlation co-efficients showing the inherent association between the traits.

Pod yield plant-1 showed significant positive correlation with shelling percentage and highly significant negative correlation with RWC while it exhibited non-significant negative correlation with SLA at 60 DAS and SCMR at 60 DAS. On contrary 100-Seed weight showed non-significant positive association with Pod yield plant-1 (Table 2).

The results of path co-efficient analysis revealed that shelling percentage and RWC had maximum direct contribution to Pod yield per plant.Significant positive correlation observed between shelling percentage and pod yield per plant, attributed to its positive direct effect followed by positive indirect effect via RWC. Similarly significant and negative correlation observed between RWC and pod yield per plant, primarily due to its high negative direct effect followed by low negative indirect

effect via shelling percentage (Table 3).

Similar kind of significant and positive associa-tion of Pod yield per plant with Shelling percentage was reported earlier by Gupta et al. (2015) whereas highly significant negative correlation of pod yield with RWC was in contrary to the report of John and Reddy (2016).

Non-significant negative correlation of Pod yield per plant with SLA at 60 DAS was in accordance with the reports of Kyaw et al., (2017). Nirmala and Jayalakshmi, (2015) reported non-significant negative correlation of Pod yield per plant with SCMR at 60 DAS. while non-significant positive correlation with 100-Seed weight.

Character association analysis indicated that for selection of a high yielding groundnut genotypes, indicated that emphasis should be laid out on shelling percentage. However, caution should be exercised in increasing the RWC as it has negative correlation with pod yield plant-1.

REFERENCES

  1. Allard, R.W.1960. Principles of Plant Breeding. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, USA and medical research. 6th edition, Loiver Boyd Ltd., Edinbugh.
  2. Balaraju, M and Kenchanagoudar, P.V.2016. Genetic variability for yield and its component traits in interspecific derivatives of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Journal of Farm Science. 29(2): 172-176.
  3. Bhavya, M.R., Shanthala, J., Savithramma, D.L and Syed Sab. 2017. Variability, heritability and association studies in F4 and F5 generation for traits related to water use efficiency and yield traits in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Archives .Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 1353-1360.
  4. Burton, G.W.1952.Quantitative inheritance in grasses. Proceedings of 6th Grassland Congress Journal 1: 277-281.
  5. Dewey, D.R and Lu, K.H.1959. A correlation and path co-efficient analysis of components of created wheat grass seed production. Agronomy Journal. 51: 515-518.
  6. Gupta, R. P., Vachhani, J. H., Kachhadia, V. H., Vaddoria, M. A and Reddy, P. 2015. Genetic variability and heritability studies in Virginia groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding. 6(1): 253-256.
  7. John, K and Reddy, P. R. 2016. Studies on characters association and path coefficient analysis for yield and water use efficiency traits in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). International Journal of Current Research in Biosciences and Plant Biology. 3(10): 128-135.
  8. Johnson, H.W., Robinson, H.F and Comstock, R.E.1955. Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybean. Agronomy Journal.47: 314-318.
  9. Kyaw, H.,Winn, K., Lin, T and Htwe, N.M.2017. Correlation and path coefficient analysis in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under monsoon and post monsoon. International Journal of Advanced Research. 5(12), 175-183.
  10. Lush, J.L.1940. Inter-sire correlation and regression of offspring on dams as a method of estimating heritability of characters. Proceedings of American Society of Animal Production. 33: 293-301.
  11. Nirmala, D and Jayalakshmi, V.2015. Character association studies of drought tolerant attributes in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding. 6(2): 630-638.
  12. Panse, V.G and Sukhatme, P.V.1961.Statistical methods for agricultural workers. 2nd edition ICAR, New Delhi pp: 361.
  13. Srivalli, P and Nadaf, H.L. 2016. Studies on genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for physiological traits in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under intermittent drought stress. Journal of Farm Science., 29 (3): 310-313.
  14. Vasanthi, R.P., Suneetha, N and Sudhakar, P. 2015. Genetic variability and correlation studies for morphological, yield and yield attributes in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Legume Research. 38(1): 9-15.
  15. Wright, S. 1921. Correlation and causation. Journal of Agricultural Research. 20: 557-585.