Evaluation Of Groundwater Quality For Irrigation Suitability In Thimmajipet Mandal, Mahabubnagar District

0 Views

D. VASU*, S.K. SINGH, P. TIWARY, P.S. BUTTE AND V.P. DURAISAMIa

ICAR-National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Amravati Road, Nagpur-440 033 a Directorate of Natural Resource Managment, TNAU, Coimbatore – 641 003.

ABSTRACT

Georeferenced groundwater samples collected from Thimmajipet mandal, Mahabubnagar district were analyzed and evaluated for their suitability for irrigation. Out of 49 samples, 12 per cent samples recorded pH > 8.5 and electrical conductivity varied from 500 to 5130 µS cm-1. All the samples have high Mg2+ content and 92 and 94 per cent samples have high Ca2+ and Na+, respectively. Among the total groundwater samples 59 per cent have high sodium hazard, 80 per cent with high magnesium hazard, 7 per cent with high Mg/Ca ratio and 100 per cent with very high permeability index. Water samples were classified as C3S1 (29%), C3S2 (39%), C2S2 (2%) and C2S1 (4%). In general, the groundwater in Thimmajipet mandal is unsafe for long-term irrigation use.

KEYWORDS:

Groundwater quality, Irrigation suitability, Permeability index, Sodium hazard.

INTRODUCTION

Groundwater is one of the prime sources for irrigation especially in arid and semi-arid regions of India. Tube wells are major source of irrigation and their share has increased from 1 per cent in 1960–61 to 37 per cent in 1999–2000 (MoRD, 2006). Telangana, located in the southern Deccan plateau region receives very less mean annual rainfall (MAR) with uneven distribution and the agriculture sector registered a mixed growth rate varying from 25.2 to -10.0 per cent during the period 2005-06 to 2013-14 due to frequent droughts. The cropping intensity has increased from 109 per cent in 1993-94 to 127 per cent in 2013-14 with a major shift in irrigation pattern making it more costly for the farmers, highly uncertain and unsustainable (Rao, 2014). The vagaries of climate change have put the seasonal agricultural system and agriculture dependent economy of Telangana in jeopardy.

The occurrence and behavior of groundwater is an outcome of combined interplay of hydrological, geological, structural and climatological factors. The composition of groundwater is determined by their source and the type of strata over which they flow (Rengaraj, 1996) and the kinds of salts found in them depends on the laws of dissolution. The suitability of water for irrigation is influenced by many factors such as quality of water, soil type, salt tolerance characteristics of the plants, climate and drainage characteristics of the soil

(Michael, 1990). The potential evapo-transpiration largely exceeds precipitation in the semi-arid regions, thereby increasing the probability of soil salinity or sodicity development if the groundwater used for irrigation is poor in quality. Telangana is now facing both depleting groundwater table and deficit rains and allocation of natural resources like groundwater to different sectors viz., agriculture, industry and drinking water use has become a challenging task for policy makers. The steady decline in groundwater level warrants immediate attention on both quantity and quality of groundwater. The groundwater quality is deteriorating particularly with high salt content and limits its use for agriculture in Mahabubnagar district (CWGB, 2013). In the context of above scenario, several studies need to be conducted to assess the potential threat of poor quality groundwater. The present study is one such type, which attempts to evaluate the groundwater for its quality and suitability for irrigation in Thimmajipet mandal, Mahbubnagar district.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Description of the Study Area

Thimmajipet mandal is part of Mahabubnagar district, located between 16°55′ N latitude and 78°20′ E longitude with on elevation of 481 m above mean sea level in southern Telangana plateau, (Agro Ecological Sub Region 7.2).The total geographical area is 200.90 km2
and covered by granite, peninsular gneiss, basalt, and mixed granite and basaltic rocks. The MAR varies from 450-550 mm. Gross cropped and irrigated areas are 14,020 and 1,960 ha respectively. Major crops grown during kharif are cotton (Gossypium hirsutum), maize (Zea mays) followed by paddy (Oryza sativa), red gram (Cajanu scajan) and castor (Ricinus communis). In Rabi groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) is the major crop followed by paddy and maize. The length of growing period (LGP) is 90-120 days. Tube wells are the major sources of water irrigating more than 90 per cent of the irrigated area.

Sampling and Analysis

Forty nine geo-referenced groundwater samples were collected from 19 villages of the Thimmajipet mandal (Fig.I) during February 2015 from tube wells in stopper fitted plastic bottles and stored at a temperature below 4°C prior to analysis in the laboratory. The samples were analyzed for pH, electrical conductivity, cations (Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+ and K+) and anions (Cl-, CO32-, HCO3 -, SO42-and BO33- ) using standard procedures (APHA, 2005). Important indicators of water quality for irrigation were derived using the guidelines given by Ayers and Westcot (1985). Parameters such as pH, electrical conductivity (EC), soluble sodium percentage (SSP), residual sodium carbonate (RSC), potential salinity (PS), magnesium hazard (MH) and permeability index (PI) were used to assess the suitability of water for irrigation purposes.

SSP was calculated by the following equation (Todd, 1995).

PS was calculated based on the formula (Hammet, 1992) as:

1
PS = 2 SO42- + Cl-

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Hydrochemistry

pH ranged between 6.91 and 8.91. Among the 49 samples studied, 12% showed pH > 8.5 and may be harmful for plant growth by (Table 1) inducing alkalinity in soils. Electrical conductivity (EC) varied from 500 to 5130 µS cm-1 with a mean value 1897 µS cm-1 (Table 1) and 20 per cent of water samples have EC more than 2500µS cm-1 which is unsafe for irrigation and may induce strong salinity in irrigated soils (Ayers and Westcot, 1985).Total dissolved solids (TDS) varied from 320 to 3283 mg L-1 with a mean value of 1214 mg L-1. According to FAO standards (Table 2), irrigation water with more than TDS > 1500 mg L-1 are classified with severe limitation for its use and 20 per cent of the water samples are unsafe for irrigation.

Ionic concentration

The concentration of cations and anions in groundwater depends on the geology, weathering of rocks and soil and water management practices. Calcium (Ca2+) contributes to the hardness of the water and the sources of Ca2+ in ground water especially in sedimentary rocks such as calcite, aragonite, gypsum and anhydride. In the present study, Ca2+ varied from 11 to 114 me L-1 and Mg2+ from 14 to 129 me L-1. The usual range of Ca2+ and Mg2+ in irrigation water is 0-20 and 0-5 me L-1, respectively and 92 per cent of water samples have Ca2+ more than 20 me L-1 and all the samples have high Mg2+. The high concentration of Ca2+ and Mg2+ results in alkalinity of water and induces osmotic stress to the plants. K+ ranged between 0.13 and 1.97 me L-1 while Na+ varied between 35.65 and 117 me L-1 (Table 1). The safe range of Na+ is 0-40 me L-1 and 94 per cent of water samples have high sodium content. Cl- varied from 5 to 18 me L-1and 39 per cent samples are with moderate Cl- toxicity, 53 per cent with high toxicity and 8 per cent with very high toxicity according to FAO standards (Ayers and Westcot, 1985). CO32- varied from 0 to 10 me L-1, HCO3- from 0.3 to 17.5 me L-1, SO42- from 0 to 63 me L-1 and BO33- from 0.2 to 1.25 me L-1.
Evaluation Of Groundwater Quality For Irrigation Suitability In Thimmajipet Mandal, Mahabubnagar District

Water quality indices

The sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) indicates relative proportion of sodium to calcium and magnesium, which influences soil physical properties especially hydraulic conductivity. Results indicated that 6 per cent of water samples have high (SAR > 18), 53 per cent with medium (SAR 10-18) and 41 per cent with low (SAR < 10) sodium hazard. Also, soluble sodium in irrigation water is an important parameter influencing the soil properties and crop performance. High concentration of sodium in irrigation water may stunt the plant growth and reduces soil permeability (Joshi et al. 2009). The soluble sodium percentage (SSP) varied from 19.74 to 71.54 per cent and 17 per cent of water samples are unsafe for irrigation with SSP > 60 per cent.

The concentration of HCO3- and CO32- influences the suitability of water for irrigation purpose. The water with high residual sodium carbonate (RSC) will increase the pH in soils. Since the calcium and magnesium content were proportionately high, effect of HCO3- and CO32-through RSC index is low as the RSC varied from -89 to -5 (Table 3). Potential salinity (PS) is an indicator of ability of water to cause salinity in soils and the suitability of water for safe use in different textured soils. PS varied from 7 to 40 me L-1 and the groundwater is unsuitable for irrigating fine textured soils (PS > 3). However, 71% samples are suitable for medium textured soils (PS 3 – 15 me L-1) and 84 per cent suitable for sandy soils.

Generally calcium and magnesium maintain a state of equilibrium in most waters. High level of Mg2+ usually promotes increase in Na+ concentration in irrigated soils. Results showed that 80 per cent of water samples are above the acceptable limit of 50 per cent MH (Ayers and Westcot, 1985). The Mg/Ca ratio for analyzed water samples varied from 0.36 to 3.18. Among the groundwater samples 73 per cent is safe (Mg/Ca < 1.5), 20 per cent is moderately safe (Mg/Ca 1.5-3.0) and 7 per cent is unsafe (Mg/Ca >3.0) for irrigation. According to U.S. Salinity Laboratory (USSL, 1954) classification, 29 per cent are grouped in C3S1, 39 per cent in C3S2 and 2 per cent in C2S2 (Fig. 2) indicating their unsuitability for long term irrigation with moderate to high salinity and sodium hazard.

CONCLUSION

The groundwater samples of Thimmajipet mandal were moderate to high in sodium hazard, highly saline and medium in chloride toxicity. The ground water is dominated by Na+, Mg2+ and Ca2+ and have the potential to cause damage to the cultivated crops by inducing soil salinity and alkalinity. Since most of the water samples were classified as highly saline, use of groundwater blended with fresh water for irrigation could be an option to minimize the potential of soil salinity. Upon long term use for irrigation the sodium dominated waters may force the accumulation of sodium in soils and may impede the hydraulic properties of soils. Hence, leaching methods need to be improvised to remove salts from irrigated soils.

REFERENCES

  1. APHA. 2005. Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Waste water, 21st Edition, American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.
  2. Ayers, R.S and Westcot, D.W. 1985. Water Quality for Agriculture: In FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 29.
  3. C.G.W.B. 2013. Groundwater Brochure, Mahabubnagar district, Andhra Pradesh.
  4. Doneen, L.D. 1964. Notes on water quality in agriculture. Published as a water science and engineering paper 4001, Department of Water Science and Engineering, University of California.
  5. Gupta, S.K. and I.C. Gupta., 1987. Management of Saline Soils and Water. Oxford and IBH Publication Coy, New Delhi, India, pp: 399.
  6. Hammett, K.M. 1992. Physical Processes, Salinity Characteristics, and Potential Salinity Changes due to Freshwater Withdrawals in the Tidal Myakka River, Florida. U.S. Geological Survey, Water-Resources Investigations Report. 90-4054.
  7. Joshi, D.M., Kumar. A., and N. Agrawal., 2009. Assessment of the irrigation water quality of River Ganga in Haridwar District. Indian Journal of Chemistry. 2(2): 285-292.
  8. Michael, A.M., 1990. Irrigation: Theory and Practice, Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 801p.
  9. MoRD. 2006. From Hariyali to Neeranchal: Report of the Technical Committee on watershed Programmes in India, Department of Land Resources, Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India, New Delhi.
  10. Raghunath, I.M., 1987. Ground water. 2nd Edn., Wiley Eastern Ltd., New Delhi, India.
  11. Rao, CH. H., 2014. The New Telangana State A Perspective for Inclusive and Sustainable Development. Economic and Political Weekly. 9:10-13.
  12. Rengaraj, S., Elampooranan, T.,Elango. L and Ramalingam. V. 1996. Ground water quality in suburban regions of Madras city, India. Pollution Research. 15(4), 325-328.
  13. Todd, D.K., 1995. Groundwater Hydrology. 3rd Edn., Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, U.S.
  14. U.S.S.L. 1954. Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and
  15. Alkali Soils. Department of Agriculture, U.S.
  16. Handbook 60.
Join Us - Editorial Member Submit An Article Subscribe TO APJAS