Effect Of Different Spacings And Nitrogen Rates On Growth And Yield Of Water Melon Grown On Polyethylene Mulch

0 Views

SREEDHAR DEVARAKONDA*, NAGARAJU RACHAKUNTA AND CHANDRA SEKHAR

HRS, Anantharajupeta, Dr. Y.S.R.H.U, Railway Kodur, Kadapa Dt., A.P.

ABSTRACT

Worldwide, a significant increase in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus [Thunb.] Matsum. & Nakai) growing areas has been registered in the last few years. Though it is a potential vegetable crop, there is not much standardized scientific cultivation technology available for improving the yield. Agro techniques like nutrition and spacing play an important role in commercial production, specially N rates and planting densities vary on a large scale, indicating that there is insufficient knowledge about their effects. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of N rate and planting density on growth and yield of watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai] grown on black polyethylene mulch. The field experiments with ‘Aaliya’ F1 hybrid (Bayer Crop Science) was planted during January, 2017. The treatments were factorial combinations of three paired row plant spacings (0.45, 0.60, and 0.75 m) and four N rates (75, 100, 125 and 150 kg•ha-1). Part of the N (35 kg•ha-1) was applied preplant and the remainder was fertigated. Vine length increased linearly as N rate increased from 75 to 150 kg•ha-1, and also with plant spacing increased from 0.45 m to 0.75 m. Total yields per ha or per plant and Average fruit weight did not increase with N rates above 100 kg•ha-1. Total yields per acre and number of fruits per plot were linearly decreased with an increase in plant spacing from 0.45 to 0.75 m. With increased plant spacing average fruit weight increased and fruit size distribution shifted to larger categories.

KEYWORDS:

Polyetrylene mulch, Watermelon, Nitrogen

INTRODUCTION

The global consumption of watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai] is greater than that of any other cucurbit (Robinson and Decker-Walters, 1997). It is a popular cash crop grown by farmers during summer due to its high returns in investment, especially in the regions of Ananthapur, Kadapa and Kurnool districts of Andhra Pradesh in an area of 5615 ha. Watermelon contains Vitamin C and A in form of the disease fighting beta-carotene. Potassium is also available in it, which is believed to help in the control of blood pressure and possibly prevent stroke .Enhanced earliness and yield in watermelon crop has been achieved through improvement of cultural practices (Lu et al., 2003; Soltani et al., 1995). Many commercial vegetable producers use mulching and drip irrigation as a common practice. Both technologies have been developed to enhance crop growth and improve water use efficiency (Brinen et al., 1979; Elmstrom et al., 1981). Specially mulching was used now a days as mulch as it conserves soil moisture, retains heat as well as it suppresses weed growth. Improved N

fertigation efficiency (Hochmuth, 2003) and decreased N leaching have also been noted (Pier and Doerge, 1995a; Romic et al., 2003).

Nitrogen has been frequently recognized as a major factor affecting watermelon yield. However, the suggested rates varied considerably. Srinivas et al. (1989) found that N up to 120 kg•ha-1 increased fruit yield, whereas Hochmuth and Cordasco (1999) who reviewed watermelon response to N, found that in majority of trials optimum yields were achieved with N rates from 134 to 145 kg•ha-1.

Competition for water and nutrients in dense plant stands might be responsible for the decrease in plant growth and yield (Knavel, 1988). Generally, in watermelon the yield and number of fruit per unit area increase with increased crop density, whereas the yield and number of fruits per plant decrease (Brinen et al., 1979; Duthie et al., 1999; Motsenbocker and Arancibia, 2002; NeSmith, 1993; Sanders et al., 1999; Srinivas et al., 1989). The increased number of fruit per area is probably the yield component mostly contributing to a

greater yield under high planting density (Duthie et al., 1999; NeSmith, 1993). However, some studies showed that average fruit weight decreases with increasing plant density (Brinen et al., 1979; Motsenbocker and Arancibia, 2002; Sanders et al., 1999).

The impact of both N rate and plant density on watermelon yield has been reported in the literature frequently, yet there is insufficient knowledge about their interaction, especially when N fertigation is used. It is likely that optimal N rate would differ for different watermelon planting densities. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of N rate and planting density on growth and yield of watermelon.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The field experiments was conducted at Horticultural Research Station, Anantharajupeta, Kadapa district of Andhra Pradesh, India during summer season…..year?.

The F1 hybrid used was “Aaliya “ belongs to Bayer crop science which is popularly called as Icebox type “watermelons, with duration 60-65 days. Seeds were sown during January 2017 on black polyethylene mulch (thickness 25 mm; width 100 cm). Drip tape was placed beneath the black PE film, and with emitter spacing at 40 cm (capacity of 4 L h-1) and plants were irrigated as needed. Weeds between rows were removed by hand if necessary, while pests and disease were controlled according to common practices.

The treatments were factorial combinations of three paired row plant spacings (0.45, 0.60, and 0.75 m) and four N rates (75, 100, 125 and 150 kg•ha-1). The rows were 2.0 m apart, and in-row paired plant spacing was 0.45, 0.60, or 0.75 m. Part of the N (35 kg•ha-1) was applied preplant and the remainder was fertigated. Remaining N for the four N treatments was fertigated in the form of ammonium-nitrate (35%N) in four applications. The first application (I) was 7 to 10 days after planting, second (II) at the early runner phase, third

(III) when the diameter of fruit was about 50 mm, and fourth (IV) when 10 per cent of fruit reached the full size. To achieve targeted levels of N, the fertigation was scheduled as 1: 3: 1: 1 ratio in the I, II, III and IV stages of the crop respectively. All measurements were taken on a subsample of five plants per plot. Melons were harvested as fruit ripened, and each fruit from all plants was weighed. The total soluble solids content was determined from juice obtained from the fruit heart section using a

hand refractometer , one representative melon was measured per plot in the main harvest. The observations on growth, yield and quality parameters were recorded and subjected to statistical analysis of variance.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Paired row plant spacing and N fertigation influenced watermelon vegetative growth, and interactions among variables were not observed (Table 1 to 14). Paired row plant spacing had a significant effect on the main vine length. In general, early watermelon cultivars have a shorter vegetative period and less vegetative growth than late cultivars. In the present study, an early watermelon cultivar was planted. The length of the vine was more (207.67 cm) in spacing 0.75 m as it was less (173.21 cm) in Spacing 0.45 m (Table 1). This might be due to the fact that as the row space was more, plants were able to intercept more solar radiation during the growth stage and this impact on the photosynthesis activity. The fact that during the growth stage the plant did not compete for nutrient, water and light has impacted on the increase in the growth of the vine and this explain the reason why the longest vine was observed on plant under spacing of 0.75 m. The above results were in consonance with Efediyi and Samson (2009) who reported that in-row spacing has positive effect on plant height. The present results were also supported by Ban et al. (2011) who found that in- row plant spacing had a significant effect on the growth and yield of watermelon. Sabo et al. (2013) also reported an increase in watermelon vine length by increasing in-row plant spacing. Vine length was increased with increasing N fertigation. Vine length was highest (202.67 cm) at N fertigation at the rate of 150 kg ha-1. But regarding the other growth parameters Leaf length, Leaf width, number of branches there was no significant difference observed in different spacings and different N fertigation rates (Table 2, 3, 4).

Yield, yield components and fruit quality

The yields per acre were significantly increased with an increase in N rate from 75 to 100 kg•ha-1 whereas the yields were not increased later by increasing N Rates. Highest fruit yield per acre (17.35 t ha-1) was found with N rate 100 kg ha-1 (Table 15).

In contrast to earlier findings (Hochmuth and Cordasco, 1999; Pier and Doerge, 1995b; Srinivas et al., 1989) in our study fruit yield did not increase with N rates above 100 kg•ha-1. We assume that total yields

achieved at the N rate 100 kg•ha-1 in the present study were partly the result of splitting N application, which may have enabled better use of the given N rate as it was found on tomato (Locascio et al., 1997) and strawberry (Hochmuth et al., 1996). We suppose that water and N distribution pattern as well as watermelon root development under drippers are factors strongly affecting those findings. As in the case of different parameters, there was no interaction between N and plant spacings on yield and yield components.

Paired row plant spacing had a stronger effect on the total yield. The total yields per acre were linearly decreased with an increase in plant spacing from 0.45 to 0.75 m. The yields per acre was highest (18.63 t/ha) with

spacing of 0.45 m (Table 15). On contrary with an increase in plant density the yield and number of fruit per plot linearly increased. Our results confirmed the findings of other studies, which suggest that fruit yield increases with an increase in plant density due to an increase in the number of fruits per plot (Brinen et al., 1979; NeSmith, 1993; Duthie et al., 1999; Sanders et al., 1999; Motsenbocker and Arancibia, 2002; Goreta et al., 2005). The Average size of the fruit was increased with increased plant spacing. Highest size of the fruit (2149.29 g) was observed with S3 spacing (0.75 m) whereas it was lowest (1374.11 g) with S1 spacing (0.45 m). Frequently, the average fruit weight decreases with an increase in the plant density (Brinen et al., 1979; Sanders et al., 1999;

Motsenbocker and Arancibia, 2002; Goreta et al., 2005). Regarding the quality parameters soluble solid content was relatively high and unaffected by the spacing or N rate applied.

The lack of interactions between N and plant spacing is somewhat surprising because we expected such interaction to occur at least under high planting densities. However, the threshold density above which watermelon yield per area starts to decline was not reached in our study. Similarly, Srinivas et al. (1989) did not report the significant interaction between plant spacing and N fertilization on watermelon yield.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our data, it can be concluded that higher yield per acre (18.63 t ha-1) was obtained with plant spacing of 0.45m, whereas average fruit weight (2149.29

g) was higher with spacing of 0.75m. Higher fruit yield per acre (17.35 t ha-1) was obtained with N rate of 100 kg ha-1. So, it is recommended to follow the spacing based on the consumer preference of the fruit size in the area.

REFERENCES

  1. Ban, D., Smiljana, G. B., Milan, O., Josipa, H., Bruno Novak, Katja, Z and Dragan, Z. 2011. Growth and Yield Response of Watermelon to in-row Plant Spacings and Mycorrhiza. Chilean Journal of Agriculture Research.71 (4):14-17.
  2. Brinen, G.H., Locascio, S.J and Elmstrom, G.W. 1979. Plant and row spacing, mulch, and fertilizer rate effects on watermelon production. Journal of American Society of Horticultural Science. 104:724– 726.
  3. Duthie, J.A., Roberts,B.W., Edelson, J.V and Shrefler, J.W. 1999. Plant density-dependent variation in density, frequency, and size of watermelon fruits. Crop Science. 39:412–417.
  4. Efediyi, E.K and Samson, U.R. 2009. Effect of inorganic fertilizer on the yield of two varieties of cucumber (Cucumis sativum L.). Report and Opinion. 5: 74-79.
  5. Elmstrom, G.W., Locascio S.J and Myers, J.M. 1981.
  6. Watermelon response to drip and sprinkler irrigation.
  7. Proceedings of Florida State Horticultural Society.
  8. 94:161–163.
  9. Goreta, S., Perica, S., Dumicic, G., Buæan, L and Zanic, K. 2005. Growth and yield of watermelon on polyethylene mulch with different spacings and nitrogen rates. Horticultural Science. 40:366-369.
  10. Hochmuth, G and K. Cordasco. 1999 (reviewed in 2008). Summary of N, P, and K, research on watermelon in Florida. Florida Cooperative Extension Service Fact Sheet. HS 755
  11. Hochmuth, G.J. 2003. Progress in mineral nutrition and nutrient management for vegetable crops in the last
  12. 25 years. Horticultural Science. 38:999–1003.
  13. Hochmuth, G.J., Albregts, E.E., Chandler, C.C., Cornell, J and Harrison, J. 1996. Nitrogen fertigation requirements of drip-irrigated strawberries. Journal of American Society of Horticultural Science. 121: 660–665.
  14. Knavel, D.E. 1988. Growth, development, and yield potential of short internode muskmelon. Journal of American Society of Horticultural Science. 113:595– 599.
  15. Locascio, S.J., Hochmuth, G.J., Rhoads, F.M., Olson, S.M., Smajstrla, A.G and Hanlon, E.A. 1997. Nitrogen and potassium application scheduling effects on drip-irrigated tomato yield and leaf tissue analysis. Horticultural Science. 32:230–235.
  16. Lu, W., Edelson, J.V. Duthie, J.A and Roberts, B.W. 2003.
  17. A comparison of yield between high- and low-intensity management for three watermelon cultivars.
    Horticultural Science. 38:351–356.
  18. Motsenbocker, C.E and Arancibia, R.A. 2002. In- row spacing influences triploid watermelon yield and crop value. HortTechnology. 12:437–440.
  19. NeSmith, D.S. 1993. Plant spacing influences water melon yield and yield components. Horticultural Science. 28:885–887.
  20. Pier, J.W and Doerge, T.A. 1995a. Concurrent evaluation of agronomic, economic, and environmental aspects of trickle-irrigated watermelon production. Journal of Environmental Quality. 24:79–86.
  21. Pier, J.W and Doerge, T.A. 1995b. Nitrogen and water interactions in trickle-irrigated watermelon. Soil Science Society of American Journal. 59:145–150.
  22. Robinson, R.W and Decker-Walters, D.S. 1997. Cucurbits. Wallingford, Oxon, U.K.; New York, N.Y.: CAB International viii, 226 pp.
  23. Romic, D., Romic, M., Borosic, J and Poljak. M. 2003. Mulching decreases nitrate leaching in bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) cultivation. Agriculture Water Management. 60: 87– 97.
  24. Sabo, M.U., Wailare, M.A., Aliyu, M., Jari, S and Shuaibu, Y. M. 2013. The effect of NPK fertilizer and spacing levels on growth and yield of Watermelon (Citrillus lanatus L). Scholarly Journal of Agricultural Science. 3(8):325-330.
  25. Sanders, D.C., Cure, J.D and Schultheis, J.R. 1999. Yield response of watermelon to planting density, planting pattern, and polyethylene mulch. Horticultural Science. 34:1221–1223.
  26. Soltani, N., Anderson, J.L and Hamson, A.R. 1995. Growth analysis of watermelon plants grown with mulches and row covers. Journal of American Society of Horticultural Science. 120:1001–1009.
  27. Srinivas, K., Hegde, D.M and Havanagi, G.V. 1989. Effect of nitrogen and plant population on yield, quality, nutrient uptake, and water use of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus Matsum et Nakai) under drip and furrow irrigation. Gartenbauwis –Senschaft. 53:220– 223.